Architecture debt slows every release
Shared components, manual deployment steps and fragile environments turn each release into a negotiation between teams.
SaaS companies, cloud-dependent technology vendors and digital platforms with their own engineering teams, running their product on AWS.
They tend to show up when growth outpaces the architecture: more customers, more data, bigger buyers and an AI roadmap, on a platform built for an earlier stage.
Shared components, manual deployment steps and fragile environments turn each release into a negotiation between teams.
Spend grows faster than revenue, and nobody can say which tenants, features or environments drive it.
Enterprise deals bring uptime commitments, recovery objectives and incident reporting the platform was not built for.
Analytics, customer-facing reporting and AI all need governed data that today lives across services and copies.
Evaluation, guardrails, tenant data isolation, cost per request and an owner in production are usually what is missing.
Large customers ask how accounts, access, logging and data are separated. Good answers start with the architecture, not the questionnaire.
For a SaaS company whose AWS bill and release cycle are both getting worse. Each step is a separate decision.
Architecture, cost and risk assessment: cost per tenant, release bottlenecks, reliability gaps and a ranked roadmap.
A focused platform sprint: account structure, infrastructure as code and a deployment path the team can repeat.
Production readiness for one AI feature: evaluation, guardrails, tenant isolation and cost per request.
Runbooks, tests, a cost view by tenant and a backlog your engineers can run without us.
An independent view of the platform before a scaling, cost or modernization decision.
What the assessment covers →BuildAccounts, identity, networking and logging that support many teams and enterprise customers.
How we set it up →ImproveFaster, safer releases and reliability targets your customers can rely on.
What we would change →DataGoverned product and customer data for analytics, reporting and AI.
How we build it →AIAn AI feature built to be evaluated, observed and operated in production.
From prototype to production →CostCost per customer made visible, with owners and a monthly cadence.
Where the savings usually are →We work inside your repositories, pipelines and rituals, document the trade-offs and leave the decision and the backlog with your team.
One platform constraint, one cost problem or one AI feature with a deadline and an owner. Not an open-ended engineering bench.
Staff augmentation, building your product roadmap for you, or running your platform 24×7. We will point you to the right kind of provider.
Guides for SaaS teams, plus methods from our payments work that apply to any product running on AWS.
How to measure what each customer costs to serve when they share the same infrastructure, and why it drifts.
FinOps · Field noteWhy rightsizing and discounts recover savings once, and what keeps the bill growing with the business rather than ahead of it.
Data & AI · ArticleA ten-minute self-assessment before you commit to an AI feature.
Start with an Architecture, Cost & Risk Assessment, or tell us about the AI feature that needs to reach production.